Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
0
institutions
Market cap
$8.7M
28M shares
52-week range
$0.21 – $20.33
0% from low
Sector
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS, (NO DIAGNOSTIC SUBSTANCES)
Exchange
XASE
CS
Click rows below (any statement) to add/remove series. Selection stays as you switch tabs.
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $367.0K | $140.0K | $163.0K | $135.0K | $141.0K | $202.0K | $170.0K | $88.0K |
| Cost of revenue | $884.0K | $893.0K | $806.0K | $850.0K | $0 | $42.0K | $31.0K | $338.0K |
| Gross profit | −$517.0K | −$753.0K | −$643.0K | −$715.0K | $141.0K | $160.0K | $139.0K | −$250.0K |
| Gross margin | -140.9% | -537.9% | -394.5% | -529.6% | 100.0% | 79.2% | 81.8% | -284.1% |
| R&D | $4.8M | $4.7M | $5.7M | $7.7M | $7.0M | $10.9M | $6.2M | $3.9M |
| Operating income | −$11.5M | −$12.4M | −$15.2M | −$18.8M | −$19.9M | −$31.9M | −$19.8M | −$10.5M |
| EBITDA | −$8.4M | −$8.1M | −$13.0M | −$18.3M | −$19.2M | −$28.7M | −$16.5M | −$12.9M |
| Net income | −$9.8M | −$9.4M | −$14.4M | −$19.1M | −$19.4M | −$29.0M | −$17.3M | −$14.0M |
| Net margin | -2673.8% | -6717.1% | -8834.4% | -14168.1% | -13790.8% | -14337.6% | -10188.2% | -15861.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | -355.19 | -93.71 | -16.41 | -14.67 | -14.69 | -21.64 | -11.22 | -8.62 |
Annual figures · source: Financial Modeling Prep
| Year | Est. revenue | Est. EPS | EPS range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $61000 | $-0.90 | $-1.07–$-0.73 | 1 |
| 2027 | $100000 | $-0.70 | $-0.84–$-0.57 | 1 |
| 2028 | $51M | $-0.73 | $-0.87–$-0.59 | 1 |
| 2029 | $74454 | $-0.60 | $-0.72–$-0.48 | 1 |
Forward consensus · source: Financial Modeling Prep
AIM ImmunoTech Inc is an immuno-pharma company focused on the research and development of therapeutics to treat multiple types of cancers, viral diseases, and immune-deficiency disorders, and to treat cancers for which there are currently inadequate or unmet therapies. Its flagship products are Ampligen (rintatolimod) and Alferon N Injection (Interferon alfa). Ampligen is a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecule being developed for globally important cancers, viral diseases, and disorders of the immune system. Ampligen is approved for commercial sale in the Argentine Republic for the treatment of severe Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).
www.aimimmuno.comNo one on the platform currently holds AIM.
No tracked institution reports a position in AIM as of their last filing.
| Execution date | Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2026-01-09 | 1001-for-1000 |
| 2019-06-11 | 1-for-44reverse |
| 2016-08-29 | 1-for-12reverse |
No one on the platform has traded AIM yet.
| $4M |
| — |
| OGENOragenics, Inc. | $0.59 | +2.55% | $3M | — |
| QNRXQuoin Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. | $4.45 | +5.95% | $9M | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
$AIM lmao are you mf kidding me? Bought more shares just add to my no on everything vote.
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM Everyone has to decide for themselves how to vote. Personally, I’m neutral on the reverse split proposal. But I think voting no on the warrant proposals deserves more thought. If DURIPANC receives FDA alignment for a lean Phase 3 later this year, AIM will need to finance that trial somehow. Rejecting the warrant proposals doesn’t eliminate dilution—it just removes one potential source of capital. The alternatives could be: • another highly dilutive financing on worse terms, • more expensive debt, • or giving away a much larger share of future economics in a licensing/partner deal. Today’s warrant holders have already committed capital. Those warrants only become meaningfully dilutive if the stock appreciates well above current levels. None of us knows which path management will ultimately take, but I think preserving financing flexibility ahead of a potential Phase 3 is worth considering before simply voting “no” across the board.
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM I just voted "AGAINST" all items. We shouldn't reward the incompetence of the board. Leadership, your investors have been through enough. You should be ashamed to even think of another reverse split. Now is the time for you to show your confidence in the company and invest in it like we have!!!!!
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM https://www.yahoo.com/news/world/articles/congo-bans-gatherings-kinshasa-three-170536405.html
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM I would love to know what Equals day-to-day activity is in chasing down an Ebola opportunity. It's only getting worse, but very quiet in Ocala.
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM p.3 Under these circumstances, it is far better for shareholders to refuse the reverse split and the proposed warrants. Even if the company delists (as happened previously), the trials can still proceed, and Equels will be forced to find funding another way (through partnerships, licensing deals, government grants, and other normal means), which any competent CEO would have done already, instead of repeatedly destroying shareholder value. Any trial success will immediately raise the stock price to a more natural level, and bring institutional investors. This would not only raise the stock price and mitigate delisting, but also solve the longstanding problem of stock manipulation that has plagued this company for years and that Equels has never addressed. Refusing the warrants and reverse split will simply force Equels to do his job for once.
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM p. 2 So with a buyout price of $10 per share, our holder of 100,000 shares before the split last year would have had $1,000,000. But after the 100:1 split, $10 would have yielded $10,000. And after the upcoming 25:1 split, it will only yield $400. This is what Equels is doing to your investment. 100,000 shares became 1000 shares (after the 100:1 split) and then (after the 25:1 split) it will be only 40 shares. This is what Equels accomplished in little more than one year. This is what Equels is doing to your investment.
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM AIM did a 100:1 reverse split just one year ago, June 2025. Before the split, AIM traded at 0.0711 per share. Afterwards, the share price was about 8.38. Now, one year later, the price is .35. The reverse split accomplished nothing. And in addition to this huge loss, shareholders experienced massive dilution. The reverse split DID NOT RAISE ANY MONEY. It also DID NOT KEEP THE STOCK PRICE ABOVE $1. It only destroyed shareholder value. 100,000 shares before the 2025 reverse split became 1000 shares now worth $350. Before the 2025 split, AIM had approximately 65,500,000 shares outstanding. After the split, there were 655,000 shares. But now — one year later — dilution led to 27,724,000 million current shares, with additional warrants proposed, for a total of 40,800,000 shares. There may be further outstanding unexercised warrants and prefunded options. Massive loss followed by massive dilution. No benefit.
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM Logically, this is a good investment. Scientifically, this is a good investment. I've been here over 6 years, and I'm down (on paper) $400K. So, apparently, not a good investment. It's been more along the lines of a "donation." Ampligen (Rintatolimod) has some degree of benefit against pretty much anything it's been tested against. AIM Immunotech continues to acquire more & more patents validating the unique value of the drug. What do they do with the new patents ? Apparently, just lock them away in a vault somewhere. Ampligen sits on a shelf in a warehouse, as people are dying. Zero contracts. Zero sales. Ampligen was (is) 100% effective in eradicating Ebola in laboratory mice. Is the CEO promoting Ampligen as a combatant to the ongoing Ebola struggle in Africa ? Who knows. (?) No communication from the CEO to the owners of the company, us, the shareholders. Oh, and now, another proposed r/s. Really ?
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM don’t worry longs not much longer .. TOM SHOULD BE FIRED!!!!
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jun/26/whereabouts-of-nearly-300-people-with-ebola-unknown-in-drc
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM  Unrelenting https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/cdc-raises-response-ebola-outbreak-highest-level-says-risk-spread-us-is-low-2026-06-26/
View on StockTwits ↗$AIM Looks like they are positioning for a RS unfortunately.
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.
Trading at 3.0× sales vs its 7.0× historical median P/S.
Fair value ≈ $0.70 · price $0.30 today
Fair-value line = the stock's median historical P/S × sales per share. Price below the orange line = cheap vs its own history; above = expensive. Not investment advice.
Click to see transaction details on SEC.gov. Form 4s cover trades by officers, directors, and 10%+ owners, due within 2 business days of the trade.