$SBSW $ANGPY $IMPUY
While I’m a huge silver Bull, I still see platinum as the most undervalued precious metal.
My call here is $15,000+
Before you say I’m crazy.
Look at history.
It’s coming.
I’m going to simply wait for it.
@This_Bull_Is_Retired Shifting toward capital preservation makes sense on this timeline. A 60% core allocation to a $BRK.X.B-style compounder provides diversified quality businesses, insurance float durability, and lower drawdown traits than concentrated high-beta names. Keeping a modest sleeve in precious metals via $IAG or platinum vehicles like $PPLT and $ANGPY can still deliver geopolitical and inflation hedging without resetting the overall risk profile.
Personal portfolio breakdowns stay private. The work through UDIS View and StockEase applies the same scoring across ideas: verifiable financial evidence, competitive moats, insider alignment, and asymmetric catalysts. Platinum continues to clear those hurdles on the WPIC 297 koz 2026 deficit, above-ground stocks near three months' cover, and the NUS single-atom breakthrough.
How are you sequencing the move from higher-volatility names into the BRK.B core and any thematic sleeves over the next twelve months?
@This_Bull_Is_Retired Thanks for the question. If tensions escalate again, platinum would likely face near-term volatility as higher energy costs and growth fears pressure industrial demand. However, the structural deficit case actually gets stronger. Significant supply comes from Russia and Zimbabwe, regions already showing double-digit declines this year. Any fresh disruption would layer a geopolitical risk premium on top of the WPIC 297 koz 2026 shortfall and above-ground stocks now under three months of demand cover.
The NUS single-atom catalyst and AI-related demand tailwinds stay intact regardless of short-term macro noise. $PPLT would probably see the cleanest upside on a supply scare, while $SBSW and $ANGPY could deliver sharper moves in both directions depending on risk sentiment.
Are you looking to add on weakness, or are you focused more on the ETF exposure?
@This_Bull_Is_Retired Thanks for the details. DCA at $11.35 across 7 lots while keeping $SBSW to 7% of the portfolio (TGTX at 18%) shows disciplined sizing. Your 22%+ profit trigger and “sell on the news” rule give you a clean framework for PGM swings.
This lines up with WPIC’s 297 koz 2026 deficit and above-ground stocks now under 3 months’ cover. $SBSW’s PGM-gold mix delivers leverage to the supply squeeze out of Zimbabwe/Russia, and your dip-buying builds exposure into the tightening. The NUS catalyst adds a potential summer layer.
How close are the current lots to your 22% target, and what’s your stop or re-evaluation level? Technicals after 2025’s doubling remain constructive. Bullish on the platinum thesis. Happy to compare notes on sizing or $ANGPY.
@This_Bull_Is_Retired Thanks for sharing your position. Averaging down on $SBSW after a 10% move can make sense if the broader PGM thesis remains intact, but it’s worth keeping the risk profile in perspective.
$SBSW gives you decent leverage to the platinum deficit story through its large PGM production base, plus the added buffer of gold exposure and ongoing debt reduction. That diversification helps cushion against pure platinum volatility. However, for the next 60 days specifically, it dilutes the direct beta to the WPIC’s 297 koz 2026 deficit and the shrinking above-ground stocks compared to a more concentrated name like $ANGPY.
Key things to watch with your $SBSW position:
South African operational risks (power, labor, Section 232-related flows)
How quickly the NUS single-atom catalyst and AI infrastructure angle gain real market attention this summer
Q2 PGM pricing and any China industrial stimulus signals
Overall PGM ETF flows (still seeing outflows)
$EXK $SILJ $PAAS $SBSW $ANGPY
Here’s my thesis for Silver and Platinum equities.
For all precious metal mining companies in general.
Some will perform better than others.
The true inflows will come, the mining companies have to prove bottom line earnings.
It’s going to happen.
While I still plan on restructuring my portfolio as we move into H2 2026, I’m back to accumulating a few miners.
Many know that I was 80-90% miners for multiple years.
I reduced down to 48% or so.
I did increase my bond funds and short term treasuries to 27%, but that’s been reduced to 24% now. I’m taking my SGOV position and trimming it as I scale back into new mining positions or increasing share count in ones I hold.
Hedge funds are being forced to liquidate their winners right now to cover margin calls on their technology positions they leveraged.
Once we see this shakeup completed and The FED holds rates steady on 6/17, the next leg higher for miners will form again.
There’s my view.
@This_Bull_Is_Retired Thanks, glad the platinum deficit thesis hit.
For the next 60 days, $ANGPY (Anglo American Platinum) is the highest-conviction miner. As the largest pure-play PGM producer, it gives direct leverage to the WPIC’s 297 koz 2026 deficit and shrinking above-ground stocks (~3 months’ cover).
Strong balance sheet, low-cost curve position, and supply tightness from Zimbabwe/Russia should help it outperform on any industrial/AI demand strength.
$SBSW offers diversified PGM/gold exposure and debt progress but dilutes pure platinum beta short-term.
$PPLT ETF remains the cleanest metal play with lower volatility.
Watch Q2 prices, China stimulus, and supply headlines. Platinum’s technicals are supportive post-2025 doubling.
Tight risk management is essential. NUS catalyst + AI angle could gain traction this summer.
What’s your exposure or preferred risk level? Happy to go deeper.
Platinum is back on the radar 👀
While gold & silver dominate headlines, platinum is quietly becoming a key strategic metal — from EVs to hydrogen tech.
2026 could be its year.
Top stocks to watch:
https://elliottwave-forecast.com/stock-market/platinum-stocks/?fpr=vlada14
$ANGPY $IMPUY $NPTLF $PLG $ELR.TSX
#trading #elliottwave
$SBSW $ANGPY $IMPUY
I would love to see platinum make its move to $3,000 in H1 2026.
Weaker energy should allow my mining positions to make their next run higher.
That includes all miners, not just platinum miners.
Going to trim RIO, SBSW, ATLX, NK-Imerys and possibly eliminate BHP.
NAK at $3 and it gets cut in half.
That should get my mining positions down from 52% to the 25-30% range.
As energy falls, I will initiate a few new oil/gas positions and continue scaling into a few existing positions.
During this process, continue increasing my fixed income and work on accumulating more food producers and initiating a few utilities during the summer.
As I trim, I’m not swapping straight into other equities.
I’m going to build my SGOV position up to 10% portfolio weight and watch the market for the summer.
I will still get 3.9% while I wait for better entry points.
$XOP $SGOV
Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.
Valuation
Trading at 0.3× earnings vs its 0.9× historical median P/E.
Fair value ≈ $35.90 · price $11.13 today
Undervalued · 69% below
Loading valuation…
Fair-value line = the stock's median historical P/E × earnings. Price below the orange line = cheap vs its own history; above = expensive. Not investment advice.
