Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
1
institution
52-week range
$41.94 – $99.99
58% from low
Exchange
ARCX
ETF
Borrow rate
0.51%
Easy to borrow
No company description on file.
No one on the platform currently holds COPX.
| Institution | Shares | Reported |
|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologiesas of 2026-03-31 | 33,297 | $2.5M |
| Ex-date | Per share | Pay date |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-29 | $0.2580 | 2026-07-07 |
| 2025-12-30 | $1.6725 | 2026-01-07 |
| 2025-06-27 | $0.2497 | 2025-07-07 |
| 2024-12-30 | $0.5303 | 2025-01-07 |
| 2024-06-27 | $0.1588 | 2024-07-05 |
| 2023-12-28 | $0.3907 | 2024-01-08 |
| Execution date | Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2015-11-18 | 1-for-3reverse |
No one on the platform has traded COPX yet.
| +0.35% |
| $3.5B |
| — |
| IYYiShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF | $180.81 | +1.36% | $3.0B | — |
| MLPXGlobal X - MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | $74.12 | -1.33% | $3.5B | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
No recent Form 4 filings on EDGAR — either no insider transactions reported recently or this isn't a SEC-registered issuer.
$COPX all give you copper exposure. $NRED.CSE gives you the risky little “what if they actually find something?” ticket 😅 Different game... different upside
View on StockTwits ↗Copper can’t be the future if nobody wants to find new copper 🤷♂️ Watching $FCX $COPX $NRED.CSE
View on StockTwits ↗$COPX ~ Copper Miners ETF. Weekly Close. Down -10.88% this week. COPX was showing the most bullish (ABC) {Wave 2} bottom scenario out of all metals ETFs (GDX/SILJ/SPPP/GLD/SLV) I follow until this weeks -10% meltdown. COPX is now following SPPP (Platinum & Palladium ETF) & CDNX (Small Cap gold & silver index) into a longer (abcde) Major (Wave 2) bottom over the next few weeks. This was as textbook as you will ever see a complete Elliott Wave (5 wave) impulsive fractal structure which unfolded before our eyes off the April 2025 (TACO Tariff) generational low. COPX was clearly in a (5th wave) blowoff on ungodly sell volume (red) in the last week of Jan 2026 (silver 121usd). Notice the steep uptrend line in gold that started in Sept 2025 has now been broken to the downside since March 2026. Good luck to all. $GLD $SLV $GDX $SPY
View on StockTwits ↗Markets Are Testing Traders' Patience $COPX $SLV $UUP https://talkmarkets.com/article/markets-are-testing-traders-patience-1782507497
View on StockTwits ↗Canada is not just exporting copper to China. It is exporting leverage. In 2024, Canada shipped 348,211 tonnes of copper ore and concentrate abroad, with China among the main destinations. Meanwhile, the U.S. remained roughly 57% dependent on net copper imports. That is backwards. The risk of a major conflict is getting closer, China is expanding its military and industrial capacity, and North America is still sending strategic raw material across the Pacific while its own supply chain remains exposed. Canada should stop feeding China’s refining advantage and work directly with the United States. Develop Canadian deposits. Build more North American processing. Reserve more copper for U.S. grids, defence, manufacturing and AI infrastructure. This is bigger than trade. Copper is strategic security now. That is why North American names like $HBM, $FCX, $COPX and earlier-stage Canadian exposure such as $NRED.CSE deserve more attention.
View on StockTwits ↗Copper isn’t losing momentum-it may be reloading. U.S. copper futures are compressing inside a bull pennant after reaching $6.716/lb in May. The key support sits around $6.14–6.17, while $6.70 is the breakout line. A clean move above that level gives a measured technical target near $7.40–7.50. What makes the setup more interesting is positioning. CME money managers recently held more than 71,000 net-long contracts, while LME call open interest through December was roughly 112,000 contracts versus 52,000 puts. Bulls are not hiding-they are waiting. That puts $FCX, $HBM and $COPX back on my momentum watchlist. It also improves the backdrop for earlier-stage names like $NRED.CSE , where Wilmac geophysics and target definition could arrive into a stronger copper tape. The trigger is simple: hold $6.14, break $6.70, and the next leg may be much bigger than the market expects
View on StockTwits ↗$NRED.CSE at C$1.51 is giving the chart a much better shape than it had near C$1.33. The important part is not just the bounce - it is the reclaim of C$1.45–1.50 after price compressed into the lower demand zone. If C$1.50 now holds on a pullback, the setup starts looking like a base rather than a temporary reaction. The next technical steps are clear: C$1.55 is the first confirmation level, C$1.65 is where momentum could accelerate, and C$1.75–1.80 is the zone that would fully repair the short-term structure. Above that, C$1.97–2.00 remains the major breakout gate. A close through that area with stronger volume would put C$2.12–2.21 back on the map. What I like here is the risk/reward geometry: support is close, the upside ladder is visible, and the copper backdrop through $FCX, $HBM and $COPX can help sentiment. For now, C$1.50 is the pivot. Hold it, and the chart starts telling a much more bullish story. $NRED.CSE
View on StockTwits ↗Oil and copper are trading on two completely different clocks. Brent is down nearly 10% this week after more tankers began moving through the Strait of Hormuz. One major shipping problem started easing, and a large part of the geopolitical premium disappeared surprisingly fast. Copper does not have that luxury. Annual smelting charges have fallen from $80 per tonne in 2024 to zero in 2026, while spot charges remain negative. China increased refined copper output by 8% last year, but global mine production grew only 1%. Oil supply can return when ships start moving again. Copper supply cannot be restarted with a traffic update. My expectation is that $XLE remains highly sensitive to headlines, while $FCX and $COPX stay tied to a slower, structural raw-material problem. That is also why I keep studying earlier-stage North American exposure like $NRED.CSE TTHE macro backdrop attracts attention, but credible targets and execution will decide which explorers actually benefit.
View on StockTwits ↗I started thinking about this because every major conflict seems to remind the world of the same thing: Raw materials are not just commodities anymore. Copper affects power grids, data centers, defense, transportation and manufacturing. When relations between countries get worse, supply chains suddenly become part of national security. That is why Canada shipping so much copper toward China feels a little strange to me. I am not saying trade with China should stop. I just think Canada and the U.S. should build a much stronger copper relationship before the next crisis forces them to. It is usually cheaper to build resilience before the world gives you a reason to need it. Do Canada and the U.S. need a deeper copper partnership? $COPX $TECK $QQQ
View on StockTwits ↗Maybe I’m oversimplifying this, but Canada has copper and the U.S. badly needs more of it for power grids, data centers and manufacturing. So why are we so comfortable shipping so much of that raw material across the Pacific? I’m not saying Canada should stop trading with China tomorrow. I just think Canada and the U.S. should start acting more like a team. Build more processing in North America Sign more long-term supply deals Keep more of the jobs and value chain closer to home. Selling to the highest bidder works in the short term. Building a stronger North American copper supply chain probably works better over the next decade. That’s just my view. Where should Canadian copper be prioritized? $COPX $SPY $QQQ
View on StockTwits ↗@IntelligentInvesting When intermediate-term bearish structures hit the NDX, that capital doesn't evaporate-it rotates. The coming 'leg lower' in tech multiples will be the exact fuel that drives the rotation into physical hard assets. While retail gets chopped up trading complex waves, smart money is accumulating safe-jurisdiction base metals. $QQQ $COPX $NRED.CSE
View on StockTwits ↗Real FOMO isn’t watching a stock go green. It’s realizing the supply problem may be much bigger than the market is pricing. The IEA sees a potential 30% copper shortfall by 2035. S&P expects global demand to rise toward 42M tonnes by 2040 while mine supply struggles to keep pace. That is why I keep copper exposure on my screen through $FCX, $COPX and earlier-stage names like $NRED.CSE NovaRed has 16,078 hectares at Wilmac, 970 soil samples completed and four IP/AMT surveys designed to narrow the target picture. The interesting part is not chasing today’s candle. It is watching a small company build evidence before copper scarcity becomes the headline everyone is talking about
View on StockTwits ↗A new iPhone loses its novelty in a year. Copper may become more valuable with every year the world electrifies. The IEA sees a potential 30% copper supply shortfall by 2035. Grids, data centers, EVs and defense all need the same metal, while new mines take years to develop. That is why $NRED.CSE keeps my attention. Wilmac gives NovaRed exposure to a 16,078-hectare copper-gold project in British Columbia’s Quesnel belt, about 10 km west of the producing Copper Mountain mine. The company has collected 970 soil samples, plans four IP/AMT grids and is targeting an initial fall drill program. $FCX and $COPX offer established copper exposure. NovaRed offers something different: an early-stage project where each operational milestone can materially change how the market values the story. I’d rather research that than replace a phone that still works
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.