Held · Bookmarked
0 · 0
portfolios · users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
0
institutions
Market cap
$4.3B
136M shares
52-week range
$13.04 – $36.99
79% from low
Sector
SECONDARY SMELTING & REFINING OF NONFERROUS METALS
Exchange
NYSE
CS
Borrow rate
0.41%
Easy to borrow
Click rows below (any statement) to add/remove series. Selection stays as you switch tabs.
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.69B | $4.88B | $4.88B | $6.97B | $7.93B | $7.11B | $7.08B | $8.45B |
| Cost of revenue | $5.15B | $4.39B | $4.39B | $6.21B | $7.03B | $6.15B | $6.18B | $7.59B |
| Gross profit | $538.0M | $490.0M | $490.0M | $751.8M | $894.9M | $958.7M | $905.8M | $857.0M |
| Gross margin | 9.5% | 10.0% | 10.0% | 10.8% | 11.3% | 13.5% | 12.8% | 10.1% |
| R&D | $40.0M | $39.0M | $39.0M | $44.2M | $42.7M | $47.3M | $47.3M | $51.0M |
| Operating income | $404.0M | $125.0M | $125.0M | $548.0M | $318.7M | $350.8M | $262.7M | $474.0M |
| EBITDA | $553.0M | $364.0M | $367.0M | $802.7M | $500.9M | $580.7M | $523.4M | $852.0M |
| Net income | $188.0M | −$21.0M | −$21.0M | $291.0M | $286.2M | $138.1M | $54.1M | $273.0M |
| Net margin | 3.3% | -0.4% | -0.4% | 4.2% | 3.6% | 1.9% | 0.8% | 3.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | 1.36 | 0.41 | -0.15 | 1.75 | 1.96 | 0.84 | 0.37 | 1.92 |
Annual figures · source: Financial Modeling Prep
| Year | Est. revenue | Est. EPS | EPS range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $10.4B | $3.35 | $3.20–$3.49 | 2 |
| 2027 | $10.6B | $2.74 | $2.55–$2.93 | 2 |
| 2028 | $10.5B | $2.94 | $2.88–$2.99 | 2 |
| 2029 | $10.2B | $0.00 | $0.00–$0.00 | 0 |
Forward consensus · source: Financial Modeling Prep
Constellium SE is engaged in the development, manufacture and sale of a broad range of high value-added specialty rolled and extruded aluminum products to the aerospace, space, defense, packaging, automotive, commercial transportation and general industrial end-markets. Its business model is to add value by converting aluminum into semi-fabricated and, in some instances, fully-fabricated alloyed aluminum products that meet stringent and performance-critical requirements from customers. It operates through three segments: Aerospace & Transportation Operating Segment, Packaging & Automotive Rolled Products Operating Segment, and Automotive Structures & Industry Operating Segment. It serves Aerospace, Packaging and Automotive and operates in the United States, France, Germany and others.
www.constellium.comNo one on the platform currently holds CSTM.
No tracked institution reports a position in CSTM as of their last filing.
No one on the platform has traded CSTM yet.
| $1.8B |
| — |
| EROEro Copper Corp. | $25.95 | -2.33% | $2.7B | — |
| FSMFortuna Mining Corp. | $8.37 | -1.65% | $2.5B | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
SpaceX raised $85B on its IPO. Now that money has to be spent, and it will move through the whole value chain. These are the key suppliers and beneficiaries: SpaceX & Starlink Materials: $HXL $VELO $CPSH $CSTM $ATI If SpaceX is deploying an $85B capital raise, one of the biggest beneficiaries could be the upstream materials supply chain. Rockets, satellites, and Starlink terminals all depend on advanced materials. HXL is a leader in aerospace composites and benefits from lightweighting trends. ATI specializes in titanium and high-performance alloys used in engines and structural components. CSTM provides advanced aluminum products, while CPSH focuses on high-performance composites. VELO could benefit from rising demand for advanced manufacturing and industrial materials. History shows that during major aerospace buildouts, some of the biggest long-term winners are often the companies supplying critical materials and components. if commercial space enters a supercycle, would you rather own the space companies themselves or the “picks and shovels” suppliers behind them? Which name is your favorite?
View on StockTwits ↗SpaceX raised $85B in its IPO. That capital doesn’t just sit - it flows through the entire ecosystem. These are the key suppliers and beneficiaries: SpaceX / Starlink (anchor demand driver) Materials: $HXL $VELO $CPSH $CSTM $ATI
View on StockTwits ↗$CSTM me too, buying. Bought 500 @ 34.25 thinking we’re at the nadir of the handle.
View on StockTwits ↗$AA >> Weekly Chart >> Aluminum has been on fire........AI, cars, everything needs aluminum..... $SPY $CSTM $CENX $RIO
View on StockTwits ↗Aluminum names starting to wake up here, and the structure is hard to ignore. Multi-year bases tightening while commodity flows quietly rotate back in: $CSTM base building, early breakout signals forming $AA major liquidity leader, key mover if metals trend resumes $CENX laggard catch-up potential if momentum expands $KALU slow grind higher, often early before sector re-rates 10-year base structures across commodity names don’t happen often. When they break, moves tend to be fast and violent. Keep watching volume confirmation and sector follow-through.
View on StockTwits ↗@cynicaloptimist @Jblack500 @BustaCapital @MaverikIT @IsabellaDC @No_Face_character Funny you mention that one as it came up in my evening scans $CSTM I was going to add it
View on StockTwits ↗@Jblack500 @BustaCapital @MaverikIT @IsabellaDC @WAJeff @No_Face_character $CSTM Beauty chart, attractive fundamentals, recent upwards earnings revisions, ROE....plus, if Europe increases defense spending, this will benefit, imo. AA looks nice too, but I prefer this.
View on StockTwits ↗$CSTM reported 1.42 EPS and 2,461 revenue for Q1. http://www.estimize.com/intro/cstm?chart=historical&metric_name=eps&utm_content=CSTM&utm_
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.
Click to see transaction details on SEC.gov. Form 4s cover trades by officers, directors, and 10%+ owners, due within 2 business days of the trade.
Trading at 58.4× earnings vs its 10.7× historical median P/E.
Fair value ≈ $5.73 · price $31.16 today
Fair-value line = the stock's median historical P/E × earnings. Price below the orange line = cheap vs its own history; above = expensive. Not investment advice.