Held · Bookmarked
0 · 0
portfolios · users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
2
institutions
Market cap
$27.3B
53M shares
52-week range
$402.04 – $565.50
69% from low
Sector
ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS & ACCESSORIES
Exchange
NYSE
CS
Borrow rate
0.41%
Easy to borrow
Click rows below (any statement) to add/remove series. Selection stays as you switch tabs.
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.48B | $3.95B | $3.68B | $4.19B | $4.95B | $5.37B | $5.63B | $5.84B |
| Cost of revenue | $3.18B | $2.77B | $2.60B | $3.04B | $3.48B | $3.48B | $3.72B | $3.77B |
| Gross profit | $1.30B | $1.17B | $1.09B | $1.15B | $1.47B | $1.89B | $1.90B | $2.07B |
| Gross margin | 29.0% | 29.7% | 29.5% | 27.5% | 29.7% | 35.1% | 33.8% | 35.5% |
| R&D | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Operating income | $556.9M | $526.7M | $494.5M | $532.3M | $709.1M | $1.04B | $1.09B | $1.22B |
| EBITDA | $687.8M | $675.7M | $629.1M | $663.1M | $855.1M | $1.17B | $1.29B | $1.34B |
| Net income | $360.2M | $361.5M | $351.2M | $399.5M | $545.9M | $759.8M | $777.8M | $887.1M |
| Net margin | 8.0% | 9.2% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 11.0% | 14.1% | 13.8% | 15.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | 6.56 | 7.30 | 6.42 | 7.28 | 9.43 | 14.04 | 14.37 | 16.54 |
Annual figures · source: Financial Modeling Prep
| Year | Est. revenue | Est. EPS | EPS range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $6.4B | $19.79 | $19.61–$20.13 | 3 |
| 2027 | $6.8B | $21.81 | $21.51–$22.00 | 3 |
| 2028 | $7.2B | $23.75 | $23.50–$23.98 | 1 |
Forward consensus · source: Financial Modeling Prep
Founded in 1888 by Harvey Hubbell, the eponymous company was the conduit through which the pull-chain lamp socket was originally sold. Hubbell has since grown into an electricity transmission and distribution behemoth, housing more than 75 brands that sell components found on power lines, in electrical substations, and in commercial and industrial buildings. The company's primary operations are in the United States, where around 90% of revenue is derived.
www.hubbell.comNo one on the platform currently holds HUBB.
| Institution | Shares | Reported |
|---|---|---|
| Renaissance Technologiesas of 2025-03-31 | 104,800 | $34.7M |
| Bridgewater Associatesas of 2026-03-31 | 8,232 | $4.0M |
| Ex-date | Per share | Pay date |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-29 | $1.4200 | 2026-06-15 |
| 2026-02-27 | $1.4200 | 2026-03-16 |
| 2025-11-28 | $1.4200 | 2025-12-15 |
| 2025-08-29 | $1.3200 | 2025-09-15 |
| 2025-05-30 | $1.3200 | 2025-06-16 |
| 2025-02-28 | $1.3200 | 2025-03-17 |
| 2024-11-29 | $1.3200 | 2024-12-16 |
| 2024-08-30 | $1.2200 | 2024-09-16 |
| 2024-05-31 | $1.2200 | 2024-06-17 |
| 2024-02-28 | $1.2200 | 2024-03-15 |
No one on the platform has traded HUBB yet.
| $30.2B |
| — |
| EFXEquifax Inc. | $158.57 | +0.06% | $19.1B | — |
| EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. | $814.41 | +2.04% | $36.3B | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
| 2023-11-29 |
| $1.2200 |
| 2023-12-15 |
| 2023-08-30 | $1.1200 | 2023-09-15 |
Trading at 34.4× earnings vs its 24.6× historical median P/E.
Fair value ≈ $368.82 · price $514.71 today
Fair-value line = the stock's median historical P/E × earnings. Price below the orange line = cheap vs its own history; above = expensive. Not investment advice.
Click to see transaction details on SEC.gov. Form 4s cover trades by officers, directors, and 10%+ owners, due within 2 business days of the trade.
$HUBB Current Stock Price: $539.40 Contracts to trade: $540.0 HUBB Jul 17 2026 Call Entry: $18.30 Exit: $34.50 ROI: 89% Hold ~22 days Shared as daily free alerts and for educational purposes only. https://dailypickai.com/freealerts
View on StockTwits ↗Most investors are chasing the AI MEMORY BOOM. I'm positioning for the entire AI BUILDOUT. The next 10 YEARS AI buildout in phases: 2028–2030: BUILD THE POWER Grid: $PWR $HUBB $VRT Electrification: $GEV $TE ALB The AI narrative is evolving from chips → compute → data centers, and now toward the next major phase: energy and grid infrastructure. The 2028–2030 period may represent a “power constraint era” for AI expansion. PWR and HUBB are key beneficiaries of grid construction and electrical engineering tied directly to AI data center buildouts. VRT plays a critical role in cooling and infrastructure for AI facilities. GEV is positioned in electrification and grid modernization, TE provides core connectivity infrastructure, and ALB benefits from materials demand in the energy transition. The logic is straightforward: as AI scales, power becomes a hard constraint, turning energy from a supporting theme into a bottleneck. in an AI power-constrained world, do you prefer grid leaders like PWR/HUBB, infrastructure enablers like VRT, or materials exposure like ALB?
View on StockTwits ↗$HUBB I love this stock, but unfortunately, they don't sponsor the mafia or give campaign donations that I know of. Correct me if I'm wrong
View on StockTwits ↗Grid infrastructure continues to be one of the strongest multi-year trades in the market. Transformer lead times are still stretched at ~2.5 to 3 years as AI data center buildouts, industrial electrification, and grid modernization all compete for the same constrained supply chain. This is not a short cycle setup, it’s structural. Key names in focus: $PWR $ETN $HUBB $GEV $POWL We are seeing sector rotations, but capital continues to flow into power generation, transmission, cooling, and grid capacity expansion. Pullbacks are being treated as accumulation zones into long duration demand.
View on StockTwits ↗$HUBB (-0.3% pre) Hubbell buying NSI, a maker of 15,000 electrical products, for $3.0B https://ooc.bz/l/104720
View on StockTwits ↗$HUBB Large-cap companies with investment-grade ratings maintain robust access to debt and equity markets, while smaller companies face elevated financing costs, equity dilution pressures, and constrained access to institutional capital. Learn more: https://axlfi.com/themes/289
View on StockTwits ↗May closes with the $500K→$10M challenge basket now at $742.5K, 10 names, up 45.4% YTD. Leaders: $POWL | $ALAB | $VRT | $CREDO Biggest disappointment: $HUBB, though the thesis remains intact. At this pace, the basket is running at a 167% CAGR, not necessarily sustainable long-term. Focus themes: tech infrastructure, semis, and innovation-driven growth.
View on StockTwits ↗Data centres are expected to account for 8.5% of America's peak power demand in 2027, up from 4.1% in 2025 ⚡️ $VRT $ETN $NVT $HUBB $PWR
View on StockTwits ↗$HUBB sorry just seen I had a lot of typos! Meant to say; Don’t sleep on this name. It is a tier-1 transmission play in the AI energy super cycle. Deep in the money options! 🤟🏾✨🥂
View on StockTwits ↗$HUBB don’t sleep on this name. It is a stir-1 transmiay in the AI energy super cycle. BULLISH AF!
View on StockTwits ↗You must know how the AI cycle will be built out and positioned early. This is how the next decade builds out: 2028–2030: The world races to upgrade grids, secure materials, and build domestic supply chains. Energy Grids: $VRT $ETN $PWR $HUBB Looking ahead to 2028–2030, the ultimate AI bottleneck has officially escalated into a full-scale "Super-Grid Expansion War"! Compute is nothing without physical electrons. Earnings visibility across these four grid heavyweights is absolute: power management titan $ETN just raised full-year EPS guidance on an explosive 240% surge in data center orders, while thermal king $VRT commands a massive $15B backlog. Simultaneously, utility hardware pure-play $HUBB printed a spectacular 18% lift in Q1 grid infrastructure sales, accelerating alongside premier T&D contractor $PWR. Smart money is aggressively buying out the physical power switch of North America. Which of these four grid empires holds your highest conviction for the next decade?
View on StockTwits ↗$HUBB WTALMF?!?!?!?!?!? 22 days downward trend. $25B-$28B company. I dare anyone to find another SUCCESSFUL $25-28 billion company with 22 day straight drop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ALGOs in the Market should be ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.