Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
0
institutions
52-week range
$0.01 – $0.11
28% from low
Exchange
OTC Link
OS
Borrow rate
19.00%
Hard to borrow
Click rows below (any statement) to add/remove series. Selection stays as you switch tabs.
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $9.4M | $43.7M | $21.8M | $5.7M |
| Cost of revenue | $135 | $667 | $881 | $337 | $51.3K | $0 | $0 | $1.0M |
| Gross profit | −$135 | −$667 | −$881 | −$337 | $9.3M | $43.7M | $21.8M | $5.7M |
| Gross margin | — | — | — | — | 99.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| R&D | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Operating income | −$2.8M | −$2.8M | −$4.4M | −$2.6M | −$5.0M | −$11.1M | −$29.2M | −$21.5M |
| EBITDA | −$2.8M | −$2.8M | −$4.4M | −$2.6M | −$2.6M | −$11.2M | −$29.7M | −$22.0M |
| Net income | −$3.5M | −$3.5M | −$4.9M | −$2.9M | −$5.7M | −$45.8M | −$52.5M | −$19.5M |
| Net margin | — | — | — | — | -60.7% | -104.7% | -240.1% | -344.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | -0.01 | -0.01 | -0.01 | -0.00 | -0.01 | -0.03 | -0.04 | -0.01 |
Annual figures · source: Financial Modeling Prep
| Year | Est. revenue | Est. EPS | EPS range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | $5M | $-0.00 | $-0.00–$-0.00 | 1 |
Forward consensus · source: Financial Modeling Prep
LAKE RESOURCES N L
No one on the platform currently holds LLKKF.
No tracked institution reports a position in LLKKF as of their last filing.
| Execution date | Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2025-10-17 | 11-for-10 |
No one on the platform has traded LLKKF yet.
| $36M |
| — |
| MMMKFAvenira Limited | $0.00 | +0.00% | $4M | — |
| NKGFFNevada King Gold Corp. | $0.51 | -2.35% | $43M | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
No recent Form 4 filings on EDGAR — either no insider transactions reported recently or this isn't a SEC-registered issuer.
$LLKKF I don't believe any of this. Don't be naive. They want money now. Just a few million bucks again to continue with the BS. Not that the project is not true, or anything. It is. It's just that they can't do that. They aren't competent enough to push this through. I see a major advertising effort again. I have no plans to sell out, but not going to buy any more and I think this project is dead with this management. We need action. We need competency from top to bottom. Not this.
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF Hopeful, but significant hurdles remain. We are officially back to Square 1 with this company. https://smallcaps.com.au/article/lake-resources-the-kachi-project-and-the-gen-5-dle-scale-up
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF The recent Small Caps article concluded the following: If Lilac’s Gen 5 beads hold up to the physical reality of Catamarca's brines at scale, and Lake’s corporate desk can successfully thread the needle on non-dilutive project debt, Kachi will emerge as one of the most strategically important, ultra-pure lithium carbonate taps in the Western Hemisphere. I am optimistic! Lilac knows the science of Kachi inside and out. Also, the potential outcome is extraordinary so it will hopefully raise the interest of others and the motivation to make it happen.
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF ChatGPT - 2 year outlook for lithium price? "The outlook over the next two years (mid-2026 through mid-2028) is much better than it looked 12–18 months ago, but I do not think we are heading back to the 2022 supercycle. My base case is a cyclical recovery within a structurally healthier market, rather than another speculative bubble. My probability-weighted outlook Scenario Probability Lithium carbonate (China equivalent) Moderate recovery (base case) 60% US$15,000–22,000/t Strong bull market 20% US$25,000–35,000/t Renewed oversupply 20% US$10,000–15,000/t The base case is that prices remain above the 2025 lows but below the 2022 extremes."
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF $ALB $LAR $LAC $SLI We aren't going anywhere until this corrects itself.
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF 250 shares made this jump 29%? Do the meme stock pumpers know about this company?
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF https://smallcaps.com.au/article/lake-resources-the-kachi-project-and-the-gen-5-dle-scale-up an ECA sugar Daddy, RIMI for energy and continued reduction in OpEx/ton.
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF eia not the weak leg, it’s the oddly slow pace on the power piece that’s over two years old (25 months after LOI and not a single power pole or substation installed for such a small project). Tells me Milei’s not betting substance on this horse, other horses may be better plays as his resources aren’t infinite.
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF I struggle with whether the depressed native sitting down or the llama’s ass is a better representation of how I feel holding this stock for almost six years.
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF Quite phenomenal that the US market is currently valuing Lake at $150M, 50% higher than the AUS market. Both are ridiculously low in the long run. Strange things.
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF Trying to understand the slow growth on ASX. Do you think aussi investors are reinvesting and moving into US shares? Just a thought.
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF https://sprott.com/insights/lithium-enters-a-new-era-of-strategic-demand-and-policy-support/
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF A Google summary update: Recent Corporate & Project Updates:EIA Permitting: The company is currently engaged with Catamarca mining and environmental authorities for its Exploitation EIA, eyeing formal approval in the third quarter of 2026.Financial Position.
View on StockTwits ↗$LLKKF A lot of green across the sector on the ASX tonight. My Aussie brothers and sisters congrats on the victory and if you could kindly keep buying LLKKF.
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.
Trading at 0.6× sales vs its 7.6× historical median P/S.
Fair value ≈ $0.52 · price $0.04 today
Fair-value line = the stock's median historical P/S × sales per share. Price below the orange line = cheap vs its own history; above = expensive. Not investment advice.