Held by
0
portfolios on TandT
Bookmarked by
0
users
Avg position size
—
of holders' portfolios
13F filers
0
institutions
52-week range
$0.21 – $0.40
22% from low
Exchange
OTC Link
CS
Borrow rate
6.74%
Hard to borrow
Click rows below (any statement) to add/remove series. Selection stays as you switch tabs.
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $266.0K | $0 | $0 | −$5.9M |
| Cost of revenue | $356.1K | $1.2M | $2.0M | $1.8M | $53.0K | $175.0K | $29.0K | $18.0K |
| Gross profit | −$356.0K | −$1.2M | −$2.0M | −$1.8M | $213.0K | −$175.0K | −$29.0K | −$18.0K |
| Gross margin | — | — | — | — | 80.1% | — | — | 0.3% |
| R&D | $38.2M | $42.5M | $52.6M | $53.4M | $27.0M | $2.6M | $7.2M | $16.9M |
| Operating income | −$45.9M | −$55.9M | −$74.6M | −$104.6M | −$145.4M | −$40.6M | −$18.1M | $11.3M |
| EBITDA | −$45.6M | −$54.5M | −$112.1M | −$92.8M | −$195.0M | −$40.4M | −$18.0M | $8.6M |
| Net income | −$50.1M | −$56.2M | −$139.9M | −$174.0M | −$210.8M | −$79.8M | −$49.8M | $3.7M |
| Net margin | — | — | — | — | -79255.6% | — | — | -63.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | -0.28 | -0.21 | -0.34 | -0.30 | -0.43 | -0.10 | -0.05 | 0.00 |
Annual figures · source: Financial Modeling Prep
| Year | Est. revenue | Est. EPS | EPS range | # Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | $-3M | $-0.31 | $-0.31–$-0.31 | 1 |
| 2028 | $-2M | $-0.20 | $-0.20–$-0.20 | 1 |
| 2029 | $-2M | $-0.22 | $-0.22–$-0.22 | 1 |
| 2030 | $-1M | $-0.21 | $-0.21–$-0.21 | 1 |
Forward consensus · source: Financial Modeling Prep
CYTODYN INC
No one on the platform currently holds CYDY.
No tracked institution reports a position in CYDY as of their last filing.
No one on the platform has traded CYDY yet.
| +12.66% |
| $252M |
| — |
| FGHQFFrontage Holdings Corporation | $0.14 | +0.00% | $274M | — |
| HLOSFHealios K.K. | $1.80 | +0.00% | $194M | — |
Source: Financial Modeling Prep · peers by sector/industry
$CYDY It is about CCR5 as a master regulator of tissue injury and repair. That’s why fibrosis, oncology, HIV, neuroinflammation, long COVID, and autoimmune disease all show signals with CCR5 blockade. This is what makes leronlimab a platform, not a single‑indication drug. Gir some!
View on StockTwits ↗$CYDY I just need to show them our data and that seems to do the trick
View on StockTwits ↗$CYDY natera up 20% since the announcement, cydy down 20%. That sounds about right.
View on StockTwits ↗$CYDY 5 days now waiting to move our 5 guys to another webpage 🤣
View on StockTwits ↗$CYDY With the standard fourth-line backbone of Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil) plus bevacizumab alone, the expected two-week change in ctDNA is typically 0% to a minor fluctuation, rather than a true decline
View on StockTwits ↗$CYDY heres what my ai said. 2part While the combination of Lonsurf (trifluridine/tipiracil) and bevacizumab (Avastin) is a highly effective, FDA-approved standard for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), rapid two-week drops in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are not typically seen with this combination alone. Substantial early ctDNA declines (e.g., a median 70% drop at week 2) have only been recently reported in clinical trials testing this backbone alongside investigational agents, such as the CCR5-inhibitor leronlimab (the CLOVER trial).
View on StockTwits ↗$CYDY Let me get this straight. ALL OF OUR 3rd LINE CRC PATIENTS HAD A DROP IN THEIR ctDNA BY WEEK 2‼️And ctDNA is the biomarker that oncologists have started using for early detection of treatment efficacy? And our lead investigator happens to be a leading expert in ctDNA and an advisor to Natera? I think we’re at the right place at the right time‼️
View on StockTwits ↗Recent $TICKER stream from stocktwits.com — refreshed every 5 minutes. Sentiment tags are self-reported by posters. Not investment advice.
Click to see transaction details on SEC.gov. Form 4s cover trades by officers, directors, and 10%+ owners, due within 2 business days of the trade.